205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -45.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -3.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 51.97%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
SBC growth well above INTC's 30.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-265.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -61.42%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-169.06%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 248.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-81.82%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 12.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-460.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -265.12%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-400.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -180.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
96.35%
Well above INTC's 127.42%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-52.12%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -23.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.60%
Lower CapEx growth vs. INTC's 9.40%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 57.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
64.25%
Purchases well above INTC's 47.51%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
29.47%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -19.47%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
103.45%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -98.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
132.18%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 76.42%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
75.71%
Issuance growth of 75.71% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.01%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 79.65%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.