205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth similar to INTC's 14.89%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-2.06%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.83%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
12.28%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 33.57%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-21.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -6.93%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
231.82%
Well above INTC's 142.61% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 59.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
378.05%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 57.10%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 193.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Growth well above INTC's 625.71%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -280.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth similar to INTC's 66.72%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 31.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -76.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
50.05%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -126.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -13.01%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -847.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
323.56%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -607.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -47.63%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.