PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 16.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-8.42%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -5.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
202.00%
Well above INTC's 51.90% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -4.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
51.38%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -171.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
776.60%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -185.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 17.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -203.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-85.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -13.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1175.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 66.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1.49%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -5.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -102.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 60.45%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 52.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 87.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 201.62%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 129.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
20.63%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 48.98%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.