205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -43.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -6.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-52.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 75.71%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
24.14%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 51.35%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-206.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.45%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 237.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-242.50%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 54.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 292.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -366.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
129.30%
Well above INTC's 31.37%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-54.34%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -25.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 45.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -2725.86%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
81.02%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -72.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
105.95%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -8.34%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.83%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -67.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
184.89%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -668.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x INTC's 35.84%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-38.18%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -51.05%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.