PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 153.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-26.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -10.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4400.00%
Well above INTC's 103.19% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -300.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 70.21%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -216.95%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.26%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. INTC's 311.78%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -61.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of INTC's 49.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
12.03%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -7.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -43.50%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
1.51%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 9.08%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 27.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 346.91%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1027.69%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 35.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-20.21%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.12%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 43.16%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.