205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -5.26%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-700.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 180.66%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.29%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -17.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
17.19%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 68.71%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -388.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-96.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -127.59%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
115.38%
AP growth well above INTC's 26.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. INTC's 126.88%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -228.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.35%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of INTC's 20.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-18.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -28.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -4.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.95%
At 50-75% of INTC's 25.80%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-561.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -74.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-103.00%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 48.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -2.74%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.