205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 60.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -139.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -0.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Well above INTC's 198.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.70%
AR growth well above INTC's 0.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
137.50%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 8.14%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
291.67%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -207.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.85%
Growth well above INTC's 384.29%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-110.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -50.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 33.08%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -11.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -1826.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 61.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 82.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 2197.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -339.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.