PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -115.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.44%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 4.14%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8050.00%
Well above INTC's 512.66% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.67%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -5.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
601.24%
Well above INTC's 1030.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
382.08%
AR growth well above INTC's 168.04%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-225.64%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 88.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
48.94%
Lower AP growth vs. INTC's 107.87%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
346.96%
Growth well above INTC's 179.12%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2900.00%
Well above INTC's 35.87%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
12.02%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of INTC's 15.60%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-24.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -36.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.19%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 92.94%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-19.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -145.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-14.13%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -52.79%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-25.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -134.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-84.02%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 17.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Issuance growth of 113.16% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-8.62%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 99.63%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.