205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 748.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.23%
D&A growth well above INTC's 2.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-119.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
55.56%
SBC growth well above INTC's 41.04%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -103.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -70.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -74.55%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 265.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -104.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -19.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -13.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 28.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.31%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -33.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
84.18%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -1.75%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.32%
Growth well above INTC's 15.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
129.62%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 8.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to INTC's 95.03%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
9.88%
Issuance growth of 9.88% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-23.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -47750.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.