205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 12.39%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -3.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
103.23%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 9100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
5.71%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -10.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.91%
Well above INTC's 138.85% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. INTC's 161.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
40.21%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -115.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
111.76%
AP growth well above INTC's 175.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
306.80%
Growth well above INTC's 15.25%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
17.65%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 60.34%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.97%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-31.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -55.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 70.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 6.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5975.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 75.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-16.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -103.40%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.