PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 27.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.29%
D&A growth well above INTC's 7.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -1.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -801.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
64.95%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -406.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
55.17%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 71.50%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
750.00%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -22.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1.97%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. INTC's 246.50%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
95.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 210.98%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of INTC's 19.18%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-48.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 14.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.59%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -456.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-155.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -82.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
24.73%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -17.72%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-58.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -140.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2082.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -187.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x INTC's 9.86%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 31.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.