205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -23.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.61%
D&A growth well above INTC's 5.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
117.39%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -174.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
45.24%
SBC growth well above INTC's 13.41%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-174.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -1803.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-161.64%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 81.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
185.15%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -445.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-415.38%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 189.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-169.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -183.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
19.05%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 757.41%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-48.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -28.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.29%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 14.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 603.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -41.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -18.06%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
96.62%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -876.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -49.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-48.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 21.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
297.37%
Issuance growth of 297.37% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
42.66%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -11.65%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.