205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -18.02%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth well above INTC's 8.19%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -498.48%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -2.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-105.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -421.90%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
303.45%
AP growth well above INTC's 465.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -212.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while INTC is 111.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -37.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Lower CapEx growth vs. INTC's 29.96%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 100.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -6.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
437.05%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 5.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
96.79%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -114.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
143.00%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 16.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.13%
Debt repayment well below INTC's 6.44%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
204.17%
Issuance growth of 204.17% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-235.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -21.66%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.