205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -9.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.40%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
11.76%
Deferred tax of 11.76% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.52%
SBC growth well above INTC's 9.58%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
106.69%
Well above INTC's 186.83% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
157.85%
AR growth well above INTC's 228.14%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-6550.00%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 150.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.73%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
87.54%
Growth well above INTC's 169.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.00%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -268.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.12%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 81.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
19.25%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -4.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -162.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
10.50%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 7.18%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-2380.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -5.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
73.97%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -183.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
33.24%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -58.14%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-40.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
46.25%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.