PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -16.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 1.96%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -8.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-630.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -87.48%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-254.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -70.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
148.12%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -207.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-117.81%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 61.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
40.91%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -85.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.00%
Well above INTC's 94.25%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-16.10%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -26.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-12.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -9.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
12.31%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -7.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 56.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 66.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-28.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 147.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-252.33%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 92.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -2.94%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Buyback growth of 98.30% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.