205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 36.97%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.80%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -3.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
56.86%
Deferred tax of 56.86% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-16.00%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
238.74%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 560.12%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
89.81%
AR growth well above INTC's 18.94%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
82.81%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 60.87%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
123.08%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -61.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
742.31%
Growth well above INTC's 917.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-384.38%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -12838.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.26%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 20.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-45.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -9.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
45.21%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -788.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
7.44%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -75.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
211.18%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -15.86%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 862.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -642.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.