205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.85%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -42.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.82%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -3.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
136.36%
Deferred tax of 136.36% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
45.24%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -7.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-179.62%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -235.50%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-672.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -218.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-44.44%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 253.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2200.00%
AP growth well above INTC's 431.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-204.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -259.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
97.80%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 231.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-12.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -43.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-45.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -8.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 26.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
26.02%
Similar to INTC's 23.88%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
91.81%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -78.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-11.35%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 55.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-10.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
71.93%
Issuance growth of 71.93% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -15.05%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.