PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 34.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
D&A growth well above INTC's 3.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1300.00%
Deferred tax of 1300.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -12.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -23.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -273.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -254.90%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
AP growth well above INTC's 449.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
339.29%
Growth well above INTC's 160.72%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
108.77%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -87.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth similar to INTC's 13.19%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-25.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -14.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -36.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 1023.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -54.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Issuance growth of 38.89% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.79%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.