205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -32.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -2334.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
22.58%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -12.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-261.54%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -3.78%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-254.29%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -85.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -96.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -30.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -41.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-163.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -71.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 20.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 88.82%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -84.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 52.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
63.21%
Debt repayment similar to INTC's 59.79%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.