PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 8.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Deferred tax of 75.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
48.00%
SBC growth well above INTC's 57.46%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 58.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-95.83%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 325.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -1.77%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -234.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-181.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -3658.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-500.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -41.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.44%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 37.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-97.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 3231.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-7.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -76.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
2.44%
Below 50% of INTC's 11.48%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
50.00%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -1331.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.17%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 47.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x INTC's 85.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
9.62%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. INTC's 14625.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-314.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.