205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.09%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -105.60%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.15%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -5.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.86%
SBC growth well above INTC's 26.17%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-109.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -251.06%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-320.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -57.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 79.16%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
72.73%
Lower AP growth vs. INTC's 291.41%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-75.90%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 9.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.86%
Negative yoy while INTC is 229.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-17.54%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -86.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-34.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -51.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-50.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -99.47%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
38.29%
Purchases well above INTC's 66.36%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
51.41%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -1.07%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
730.77%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -156.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
173.44%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 106.36%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-100.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.