PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 2011.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 209.66%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
78.57%
Deferred tax of 78.57% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-20.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -11.10%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
126.17%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -189.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth well above INTC's 96.54%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -754.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -297.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
227.40%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -127.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 1087.50%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 855.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-32.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -166.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 18697.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -393.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 166.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -118.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-272.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -4294.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-39.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -103.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
39.29%
Issuance growth of 39.29% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
15.74%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.