205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.51%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -107.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.38%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -66.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-5666.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-8.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -7.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-105.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 147.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3.33%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 67.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-72.20%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 80.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-19.05%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 194.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-11.29%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 118.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-117.24%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -38.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-26.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -0.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-22.41%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 70.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 60.57%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
20.34%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -53.61%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-120.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 141.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
51.40%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 51.31%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
214.96%
Debt repayment above 1.5x INTC's 27.38%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-35.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
14.86%
Buyback growth of 14.86% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.