PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 153.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.76%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -3.80%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-550.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.73%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 24.76%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
40.90%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -3.68%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-538.89%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 197.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
16.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 336.80%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
159.68%
AP growth well above INTC's 57.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -61.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while INTC is 263.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 257.31%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-47.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 20.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 40.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -9.80%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
1150.00%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -146.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-8617.86%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 67.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.21%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of INTC's 86.35%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-23.53%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 38.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.30%
Buyback growth of 23.30% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.