205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -78.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.67%
D&A growth well above INTC's 7.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 819.05%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -16.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.82%
Well above INTC's 178.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
74.68%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -82.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
59.41%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -48.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-63.51%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 106.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
359.38%
Growth well above INTC's 131.30%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
61.63%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 131.50%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
38.46%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 107.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -21.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-5.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -23.59%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-111.90%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 115.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
28.97%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -163.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x INTC's 61.37%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
4.62%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -7.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
41.77%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.