PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 758.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
D&A growth well above INTC's 2.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-41.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-13.92%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 3.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4766.67%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -106.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1045.00%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -465.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
49.16%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -34.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-137.04%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 1305.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
15.66%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -193.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.12%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -346.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -20.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.21%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -16.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -407.38%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.72%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 35.07%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
18.23%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -19.90%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-20.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 2325.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
81.64%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 28.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 85.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.