205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -322.57%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
D&A growth well above INTC's 0.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -33.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Well above INTC's 89.91% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-134.48%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
72.62%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 168.31%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
232.47%
AP growth well above INTC's 247.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.78%
Growth well above INTC's 29.56%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 1603.74%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.47%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 287.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 4.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -72.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.97%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -20.65%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -72.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -257.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
Debt repayment similar to INTC's 83.42%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
281.54%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -99.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.