205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.23%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -961.43%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.51%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 40.60%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
61.18%
Deferred tax of 61.18% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-25.00%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-262.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 1265.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-277.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -94.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-726.09%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -441.20%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-87.25%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -32.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2910.00%
Growth well above INTC's 500.81%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1166.67%
Negative yoy while INTC is 89.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
10.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 76.88%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -13.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.06%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -24.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-13.74%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 123.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-186.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 600.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-993.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -603.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-52.82%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 7000.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-347.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.