205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -240.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
D&A growth well above INTC's 12.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
42.53%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 357.89%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -2.92%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.69%
Well above INTC's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
47.52%
AR growth well above INTC's 42.51%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
21.88%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 319.28%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.03%
AP growth well above INTC's 247.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
137.09%
Growth well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -527.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of INTC's 152.15%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 31.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 30.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 79.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -2675.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
53.75%
Buyback growth of 53.75% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.