PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -42.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -1.84%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
42.53%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -61.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 18.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
100.69%
Well above LSCC's 107.80% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
47.52%
AR growth well above LSCC's 68.03%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
21.88%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -87.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.03%
AP growth well above LSCC's 132.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
137.09%
Growth well above LSCC's 82.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Well above LSCC's 114.56%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
119.08%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x LSCC's 20.82%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 16.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -24.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-206.54%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
53.75%
We have some buyback growth while LSCC is negative at -83.42%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.