PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
200.23%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -84.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.49%
Well above LSCC's 67.88% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-3480.00%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
98.50%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -29.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
716.67%
Growth well above LSCC's 92.10%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-526.36%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
59.20%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 238.31%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
13.73%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 6.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.77%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 141.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
75.53%
Liquidation growth of 75.53% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.89%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 121.63%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 35.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
50.00%
Buyback growth of 50.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.