205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-43.71%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 35.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-184.74%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 408.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
40.78%
AR growth of 40.78% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-1950.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -3.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.32%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 2090.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
108.83%
Growth of 108.83% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-23.75%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 301.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -9.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -814.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-36.40%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2323.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -1343.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.64%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 940.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.03%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.