PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.06%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 4.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -228.92%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -168.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -144.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-107.78%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
34.22%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -98.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.53%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 95.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.10%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. LSCC's 84.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
5.39%
Liquidation growth of 5.39% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-32.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
26.41%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 85.88%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.42%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -85.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
35.29%
Buyback growth of 35.29% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.