PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.10%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -2744.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.62%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -0.20%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-57.14%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.59%
Well above LSCC's 17.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.63%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 22.21%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.97%
Growth well above LSCC's 14.73%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-841.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 4306.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.00%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 104.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.77%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -3.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.91%
Purchases growth of 7.91% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-27.75%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -152.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.67%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 4.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.66%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.