PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.69%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 88.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.51%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -0.88%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
245.45%
Well above LSCC's 97.98% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.93%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 16.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -95.65%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.16%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 24.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
171.66%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -99.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
133.53%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -2686.33%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.36%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 60.87%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
19.15%
Below 50% of LSCC's 174.54%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.71%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 151.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -65.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
44.08%
Buyback growth of 44.08% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.