PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
67.24%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -104.66%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-16.67%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -10.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
6.25%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -610.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.12%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 45.60%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.41%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 3177.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.52%
Growth well above LSCC's 91.60%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-96.42%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 7557.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.05%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 166.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
49.15%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -190.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.20%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. LSCC's 140.09%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-33.69%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 355.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.66%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -1318.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.67%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 75.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
1.18%
Buyback growth of 1.18% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.