PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
97.89%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -76.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.24%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 0.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1011.11%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.25%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -92.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 1995.65%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.96%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -121.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
119.51%
Well above LSCC's 121.81%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
45.99%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -65.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-51.98%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 7.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.58%
Purchases growth of 8.58% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
9.52%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -4.54%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 81788.89%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
128.85%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 23.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -335.59%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
93.00%
Buyback growth of 93.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.