PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-282.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -784.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.19%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 3.72%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
205.00%
Deferred tax of 205.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
703.03%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -485.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1200.00%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 37.02%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
653.33%
Growth well above LSCC's 198.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
298.89%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -440.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
31.68%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -103.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.27%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 58.16%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-72.07%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 451.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2470.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -21.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.09%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 318.95%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-414.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.