205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
134.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 85.18%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.00%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 9.83%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-112.38%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 195.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.79%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -5.58%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -120.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-88.30%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 17.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-73.66%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 2224.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
44.07%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -50.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -68.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
318.88%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -34.20%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.42%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -540.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -78.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.