PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.42%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 10.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.87%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -9.47%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
46.15%
Deferred tax of 46.15% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.32%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 553.56%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-28.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -17.69%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
237.84%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 3490.26%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-219.05%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 100.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
92.86%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 249.31%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-22.73%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 22.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 73.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.70%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 9.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8900.00%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 153.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
193.75%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -92.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-27.08%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.