205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
258.74%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -56.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.36%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 3.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
320.25%
Deferred tax of 320.25% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.58%
Well above LSCC's 228.82% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 284.16%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.86%
Growth well above LSCC's 257.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-214.71%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 534.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
109.22%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -500.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 22.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.10%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -390.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.91%
Below 50% of LSCC's 43.67%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
82.81%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
75.32%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -540.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.94%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 5.02%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-91.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.