PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.42%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -7.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Deferred tax of 600.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -71.43%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
16.46%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 52.80%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-2988.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -210.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -55.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.22%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -140.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -86.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
Below 50% of LSCC's 109.50%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
7.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 23.12%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 218.37%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
34.30%
Buyback growth of 34.30% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.