205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.97%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -107.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.05%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -3.46%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1342.86%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -405.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.85%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -72.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
476.74%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -1424.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
464.29%
Well above LSCC's 38.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
38.54%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -379.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
36.06%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -75.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.93%
Purchases well above LSCC's 40.47%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
1.24%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -30.50%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.01%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 39.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-277.55%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.