205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 17.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-10.84%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -13.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
9.76%
Deferred tax of 9.76% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.36%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -38.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 352.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-196.37%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 50.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-96.08%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-59.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -40.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-31.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 23.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -25.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
34.53%
At 50-75% of LSCC's 55.30%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
625.00%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
727.78%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 178.94%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -99.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-303.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.