PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 25.04%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -7.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-370.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Well above LSCC's 135.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
1333.33%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 13.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
67.36%
Growth well above LSCC's 123.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1125.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -189.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 110.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
7.22%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -46.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Purchases well above LSCC's 4.22%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -15.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-130.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
348.32%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -36.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.46%
Buyback growth of 13.46% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.