PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.80%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -224.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
28.38%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -3.40%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-184.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.19%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 697.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-361.36%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 96.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.47%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 7221.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-147.45%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 261.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-40.03%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 111.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.11%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -0.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 24.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
60.29%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -456.13%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.42%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -61.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.38%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 8200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-75.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.