205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.69%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 96.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-34.71%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -12.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
61.29%
Deferred tax of 61.29% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -155.04%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.43%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -196.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -142.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -121.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-38.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -201.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-17.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 17.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-17600.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
57.02%
Purchases well above LSCC's 27.67%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
23.51%
Below 50% of LSCC's 121.80%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.54%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 187.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 1456.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-65.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.