PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Net income growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 356.01%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-1.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -0.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 67.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -0.98%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 112.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -36.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 251.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -98.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -113.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-15.46%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 64.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
49700.00%
Growth of 49700.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
146.91%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -126.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 54.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.