PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -56.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.29%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-12.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 350.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 77.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 1051.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
102.19%
Well above LSCC's 149.19%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-34.43%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 191.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
26.20%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 50.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
56.46%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -7.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
30.23%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x LSCC's 2.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-34.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -30.99%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -58.04%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.