205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.71%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.51%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 7.99%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-67.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.78%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -655.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.62%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -186.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.14%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -974.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-617.65%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 132.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
101.67%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -306.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
22.46%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -0.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. LSCC's 57.08%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-41.55%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -339.94%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 968.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -83.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.